What distinguishes diversion mandates from diversion goals?

The distinguishing feature of diversion mandates from diversion goals is that mandates carry potential penalties for non-fulfillment. This is significant because it implies that mandates are legally enforceable requirements, meaning failure to comply can result in sanctions or fines. This creates a more urgent obligation for municipalities and organizations to meet specific diversion rates or targets set by regulation.

In contrast, diversion goals generally reflect aspirational targets aimed at reducing waste and enhancing recycling efforts but do not carry explicit penalties. They serve as benchmarks for performance and can guide planning and initiatives but lack the mandatory enforcement aspect of mandates.

While some goals may indeed be determined by local governments, this characteristic is not inherently distinguishing from mandates. Additionally, since mandates are usually tied to specific regulations, they don’t focus on voluntary compliance but rather on obligatory adherence to set requirements. Finally, diversion goals apply to a broader range of waste types, not just hazardous waste, making it incorrect to assert that they apply solely to that category.